Hello, thanks for the clarification. I suspected something like this although the maschine is still running reasonably well. I will upgrade the Webserver to 2.2 as the present release came with Oracle and seems to have no apxs-Files.
Thanks a lot, Peter Henningsen Senior Consultant Rainer Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09.03.2007 20:49 Please respond to "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> To Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> cc Subject <SPAM> Re: Should mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686 support Apache2.0 as well? Hello, module binaries for Apache httpd 2.0 and 2.2 are definitely incompatible. Combining httpd 2.0 and mod_jk compiled for 2.2 will result in completely undefined behaviour! Although most modules compile unchanged from source for 2.0 and 2.2 (so does mod_jk), the resulting binary only works for the httpd version (2.0 or 2.2) it has been compiled for. Since there are no 2.0 binaries for download available until now, you need to compile the module yourself. If you've got apxs/apxs2 on your system (a version that came with your httpd 2.0) and a gcc compiler, compiling mod_jk is *very* simple. Just "./configure --with-apxs=/path/to/apxs" and then "make". Regards, Rainer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I guess everyone has heard about the security issue that was fixed in > mod_jk recently. > > I did install the new version, but since then I see a lot of log entries > from mod_jk like : > > jk_uri_worker_map.c (614)]: In jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, > wrong parameters > > The Apache Log shows entries like > ... > Destroying config 0x800b5c10 > Creating new config (0x800d8060) for (null) > ... > > The maschines seem to work fine, but I suspect, I have installed a wrong > connector version. > > My Tomcat 5.5 and Apache2.0 are on a MACHTYPE=i686-suse-linux > > I installed mod_jk-1.2.21-apache-2.2.x-linux-i686.so as binary as there > is no linux binary for apache2.0. > I have not found decisive information about what version to use in the > documentation. > > So here is my question at last: Should the mod_jk apache2.2 binary support > also apache 2.0 (and the errors are caused by something else)? > > Kind regards, > > Peter Henningsen > Senior Consultant --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
