The connectors tutorial is located at http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/howto/apache.html
be sure to Read the howto at http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/howto/workers.html Assuming you are not using auto-conf I would use the supplied workers.properties from the supplied connectors tutorial If you follow instructions previously mentioned to setup JkMount in your workers.properties you should only forward those requests identified in JkMount be aware that when you configure in multiple workers through loadbalance the higher lbfactor is favored over lower worker.worker2.lbfactor=3 worker.worker1.lbfactor=2 (worker2 is favored to handle incoming request over worker1) Viel Gluck, Martin This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information for the use of the designated recipients named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any review, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its contents ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rainer Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <users@tomcat.apache.org> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 2:44 AM Subject: Re: jk connector problems > Hi Martin, > > these lines only mean, that mod_jk is checking whether it should forward > the request or not, but it doesn't find a match (=JkMount), so it > decides to let other apache modules handle the request. This part of > request processing is normal, even if there is no JkMount. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > Martin Hochreiter schrieb: >> Rainer Jung schrieb: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Martin Hochreiter schrieb: >>> >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> I have some problems with Tomcat & JK Connector and Apache Virtual >>>> hosts. >>>> >>>> Apache should only give requests of one virtual host to the jk >>>> connector, but >>>> it handles all requests over to the jk connector, no matter what host. >>>> >>> >>> I didn't try your config, but it looks like the config is OK. The first >>> virtual server should not forward any requests, the second one should >>> forward all requests. >>> >>> >>>> Actually the log files of jkerror.log are very big - and getting bigger. >>>> >>> >>> You've not JkLogLevel statement. The docs say it's default is INFO, but >>> some versions of mod_jk are broken with respect to the default log level >>> and take debug or trace instead. Please add an explicit "JkLogLevel >>> info" to the config. >>> >>> >>>> As jk could not map the uri of other virtual hosts, it gives the request >>>> back to apache (or something) and the right page opens, but I don't >>>> want apache to handle all requests of all virtual hosts to the >>>> connector. >>>> >>> >>> Are you sure that mod_jk actually tries to forward the requests for the >>> first virtual host? Maybe you are only mislead by the debug logging int >>> the log file. Of course mod_jk will look at the requests (and log some >>> debug lines) even, if it later decides not to forward a request via a >>> worker. >>> >>> >>>> Can somebody please give me hint? >>>> >>> >>> Lower your log level and try to make more explicit, why you think, that >>> mod_jk forwards all requests for both virtual servers. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Rainer >>> >> Hello Rainer! >> >> I will lower the log level and monitor the issue - >> I think that the connector gets every request because of >> these lines in jkerror.log: >> >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (486)]: Into >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to >> map URI '/error/include/top.html' >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (486)]: Into >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to >> map URI '/error/include/bottom.html' >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (486)]: Into >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to >> map URI '/error/contact.html.var' >> [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: >> jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match >> >> This are requests to the first virtual host and I don't understand why >> apache handles >> that requests over to the connector. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
