In the dependency tree of one of the services that is still not showing the log 
entry, I see logback-core, logback-classic, and log4j-to-slf4j. In one service 
that is showing the log entry, it only has logback-classic.  The service that 
is not showing the log entry is using a NEWER version of springboot than the 
one that is showing it, along with a newer patch version of logback.

I also see that “org.apache.juli.logging.Log”, a class in tomcat-juli, is also 
present in tomcat-embed-core.  Both the “good” and “bad” service use the same 
version of tomcat-embed-core.

I remember now that we actually already have a “logging.properties” file in the 
classpath of both services, with the following contents:
handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.level = ALL
java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler.formatter = java.util.logging.SimpleFormatter
------------------

From: Christopher Schultz <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 8:40 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Still struggling with getting root causes of exceptions in 
tomcat-embed-core in SpringBoot applications

David, On 11/6/25 1: 51 PM, KARR, DAVID wrote: > We support a large number of 
SpringBoot applications using tomcat-embed-core (currently at 10. 1. 41). There 
are some configuration issues that result in the service startup failing with a 
"Tomcat
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

David,



On 11/6/25 1:51 PM, KARR, DAVID wrote:

> We support a large number of SpringBoot applications using tomcat-embed-core 
> (currently at 10.1.41).  There are some configuration issues that result in 
> the service startup failing with a "Tomcat startup" exception, which provides 
> no information about the actual root cause.

>

> I've spent a lot of time looking at the Tomcat "StandardContext" class for 
> this.  The catch clauses in that typically call "getLogger().error(...". I 
> find that I can set breakpoints at all the "ok = false" lines, and if the 
> root cause is repeatable on my desktop (pretty rare, actually), I can set a 
> breakpoint there and inspect the exception in the catch clause, but the log 
> statement doesn't appear anywhere that I can find.

>

> I've asked related questions about this in the past, and there were times 
> that I thought I had a solution, but I now know I do not.  It appears that 
> since the "bridge" artifact is in use, we can set "logging.level." 
> properties.  However, I have a feeling that only affects the log statements 
> that directly use the "log" instance variable defined directly in 
> "StandardContext". It doesn't seem to have any effect on the catch clauses 
> that use "getLogger().error(...".

>

> I now have a simple and repeatable test case for this, so I can experiment 
> with variations, but I'm still unable to get this to show the actual root 
> cause.

>

> I also note that although our services are mostly on v10.1.41 of 
> tomcat-embed-core, I see different behavior depending on what version of 
> SpringBoot they are using.  In one service that is not showing the root 
> cause, I find that it is using version 3.3.11 of SpringBoot, which also 
> results in version 1.5.18 of logback-core.  Another service is using a 
> slightly older version of SpringBoot, version 3.3.4 (logback-core 1.5.8), and 
> that one IS showing the root cause.

>

> Over the last few months when I've struggled with this, I've tried other 
> variations like a "logging.properties" file that sets Catalina-specific 
> properties, but I don't think that made any difference, although that was 
> before I had this repeatable test case.

>

> I also note that in the service that shows the root cause, I see this in my 
> log:

>

> 08:43:14,376 |-INFO in 
> ch.qos.logback.classic.jul.LevelChangePropagator@4eba373c<mailto:ch.qos.logback.classic.jul.LevelChangePropagator@4eba373c>
>  - Propagating DEBUG level on Logger[org.apache.catalina] onto the JUL 
> framework

>

> I do NOT see that in the service that is not showing the root cause.



What other logging-related libraries are being deployed along with your

application. You mentioned logback. Is there anything else? For example,

tomcat-juli.jar?



If tomcat-juli.jar is present, then logging.properties will be used by

java.util.logging to produce logs.



If, however, you (or Spring) have installed some other kind of logging

bridge over to logback, then logging.properties will probably be ignored

in favor of however logback is configured.



-chris





---------------------------------------------------------------------

To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

For additional commands, e-mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


Reply via email to