Hi Mark, hope to find you well. Just following up, did you get the build working? I tried a few more times but I couldn't make any progress.
Fede On Thu, May 22, 2025, 08:22 federico bustamante <busta...@gmail.com> wrote: > I couldn't make it work with mingw64. > The switch to 3.5 LTS would be wonderful, I hope you can get the build > working, Mark. > Please keep us updated. > > Thanks, > Fede. > > On Thu, May 22, 2025, 07:07 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 22/05/2025 07:53, Mark Thomas wrote: >> > On 21/05/2025 23:04, federico bustamante wrote: >> >> Yes, I don't have high hopes on make in it work on Ubuntu, but I >> >> thought of >> >> giving it a try using mingw-64. >> >> I'll report back. >> > >> > I've been building the Tomcat Native binaries for Windows for a while. >> > I'll try with 3.5 and report back. >> >> This won't work with the currently documented Tomcat Native build >> process for Windows >> I'm working on some updates. >> >> > I'll also start a discussion on dev@ about switching the convenience >> > builds to use OpenSSL 3.5 since that is the new LTS version. >> >> Looks like we are heading towards consensus to do that - assuming I can >> get the build working. >> >> Mark >> >> > >> > Mark >> > >> >> >> >> Fede >> >> >> >> On Wed, May 21, 2025, 18:20 Christopher Schultz < >> >> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Federico, >> >>> >> >>> On 5/21/25 2:22 PM, federico bustamante wrote: >> >>>> I've only tried with OpenSSL 3.5, but I suspect it's the same story >> >>>> with >> >>>> older versions (which, to be honest, wouldn't bother me as much as it >> >>> being >> >>>> a specific problem with 3.5). >> >>> >> >>> I'll try reproducing the build process on Windows. We know the build >> CAN >> >>> be produced on Windows, because, well... we produce convenience >> binaries >> >>> for Windows with each tcnative release. But there may be some >> >>> environmental nuances that aren't completely documented in our build >> >>> process. We should fix that if it's the case. >> >>> >> >>>> I'll try building the DLL on Ubuntu. >> >>> >> >>> Strictly speaking, this is not possible. You may be able to build a >> >>> Linux binary, but creating a Windows DLL on Linux would require that >> you >> >>> set up a toolchain that is much more complicated than just doing it on >> >>> Windows in the first place. >> >>> >> >>> -chris >> >>> >> >>>> On Wed, May 21, 2025, 13:35 Christopher Schultz < >> >>>> ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> Federico, >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 5/21/25 12:27 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote: >> >>>>>> Federico, >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 5/21/25 10:58 AM, federico bustamante wrote: >> >>>>>>> Hi! >> >>>>>>> Did anyone have any luck building tcnative-2.dll with Openssl 3.5 >> to >> >>> add >> >>>>>>> Post Quantum Cryptography support? >> >>>>>>> I tried following the steps in the wiki, but didn't have any luck >> >>> (tried >> >>>>>>> with cmake and nmake). >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Have you been able to compile tcnative-2.dll with earlier versions >> of >> >>>>>> OpenSSL? I'm asking to see if you are having trouble with building >> >>>>>> tcnative in general, or if OpenSSL 3.5 is what is causing the >> >>>>>> problem. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> FYI I just tried building libtcnative on MacOS against OpenSSL 3.5 >> and >> >>>>> the build was successful. I believe the build process for Windows >> >>>>> is ... >> >>>>> complex compared to *NIX-style builds. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> But I wanted to confirm that tcnative didn't have any issues with >> >>>>> building against OpenSSL 3.5 in general, and that seems not to be >> the >> >>> case. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> So the problem must be with the Windows build process itself. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -chris >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >>
