Thanks Chris.

Il 02-Jan-25 19:34, Christopher Schultz ha scritto:
Ivano,

On 12/31/24 3:56 AM, Ivano Luberti wrote:
Chris

Il 27-Dec-24 19:18, Christopher Schultz ha scritto:
Ivano,

On 12/27/24 12:48 PM, Ivano Luberti wrote:
Chris, first of all thanks for your response.

Il 27-Dec-24 18:37, Christopher Schultz ha scritto:

Ivano,

On 12/27/24 11:48 AM, Ivano Luberti wrote:
> Tomcat version is 9.0.96
>
> I have two questions:
>
> 2) The docs (https://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-9.0-doc/servletapi/ javax/ servlet/ServletContextListener.html) state that
>
>> All servlets and filters have been destroyed before any ServletContextListeners are notified of context destruction.
>>
> Now in my code I have a servlet class (MyServletClass) that implements ServletContextListener and  contextDestroyed
>
> and another not servlet class  (say MyClass) that implements those as well.

You have a Servlet that implements ServletContextListener, and also includes a contextDestroyed(ServletContextEvent) method? Okay.

> Using breakpoints I see that MyClass.contextDestroyed called BEFORE MyServletClass.contextDestroyed
>
> and for what I understand it should be the other way around.

For what reason? If they are both implementing ServletContextListener, they should both be called. But there is no guarantee of the order in which they are called.

The fact that one of them is a Servlet is not relevant.

The doc says:

All servlets and filters have been destroyed before any ServletContextListeners are notified of context destruction.

Correct. So your servlet's destroy() method should be called before any ServletContextListener.contextDestroyed() method is called, and for your Servlet/ServletContextListener, you should get one call before the second, reliably.

If you use a debugger (or just logging statements), you should be able to confirm that.

In other words the docs are saying that for each servlet destroy() is called before contextDestroyed). Right ?

/Every/ servlet should have .destroy() called before /any/ filter gets a .contextDestroyed() call.

Then I think it should be stated more precisely since it can be interpreted as all the servlets are destroyed before any contextDestroyed() method is called in any class.

I believe we are saying the same thing.

Please note that Apache Tomcat is not responsible for the language of the Servlet Specification. If you believe there is confusing language in the spec, please file a bug against the Jakarta EE project here:
https://github.com/jakartaee/servlet

From Tomcat's perspective, it's just a ServletContextListener like any other. I would bet that you get two separate instances of that class in memory, as well: one to serve as the Servlet and another to serve as the ServletContextListener. Forcing them to be the same object might be difficult to accomplish.

I can't follow you: if I have a class like

public class MyServlet extends HttpServlet implements ServletContextListener {

there will be two objects in memory?

Most likely, yes. Try this:


public class MyServlet extends HttpServlet implements
ServletContextListener {
    public void init() {
getServletConfig().getServletContext().log(getClass().getName() + " instance " + hashCode() + " init()");
    }

    public void destroy() {
getServletConfig().getServletContext().log(getClass().getName() + " instance " + hashCode() + " destroy()");
    }

    public void contextInitialized(ServletContextEvent sce) {
        sce.getServletContext().log(getClass().getName() + " instance " + hashCode() + " contextInitialized()");
    }

    public void contextDestroyedServletContextEvent sce) {
        sce.getServletContext().log(getClass().getName() + " instance " + hashCode() + " contextDestroyed()");
    }
}

You should end up with log messages that look like this:

MyServlet instance 3876ace contextInitialized()
MyServlet instance ab65de init()
MyServlet instance ab65de destroyed()
MyServlet instance 3876ace contextDestroyed()

If that's not the case, please post source for a web application that reproduces the issue and we will look at it.

I can confirm you are right.

Good :D

-chris


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

--

Archimede Informatica tratta i dati personali in conformità a quanto
stabilito dal Regolamento UE n. 2016/679 (GDPR) e dal D. Lgs. 30 giugno 2003 n. 196
per come modificato dal D.Lgs. 10 agosto 2018 n. 101.
Informativa completa <http://www.archicoop.it/fileadmin/pdf/InformativaTrattamentoDatiPersonali.pdf>

Il contenuto di questo messaggio e dei suoi eventuali allegati è riservato. Nel caso in cui Lei non sia il destinatario, La preghiamo di contattare telefonicamente o via e-mail il mittente ai recapiti sopra indicati e di cancellare il messaggio e gli eventuali allegati dal Suo sistema senza farne copia o diffonderli. Le opinioni espresse sono quelle dell'autore e non rappresentano necessariamente quelle della Società. This message and any attachment are confidential.If you are not the intended recipient, please telephone or email the sender and delete this message and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you must not copy this message or attachment or disclose the contents to any other person. Any opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the Company.

dott. Ivano Mario Luberti

Archimede Informatica società cooperativa a r. l.
Via Gereschi 36, 56127 Pisa

tel.: +39 050/580959

web: www.archicoop.it
linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/ivanoluberti
facebook: www.facebook.com/archimedeinformaticapisa/

Reply via email to