Hello,
Timothy Collett wrote:
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:45 AM, Boris Unckel wrote:
The usage of common/lib or common/shared is generally not a good idea
if you are not forced to do it (i.E. a JDBC-Driver).
Does AspectJ have the requirement to be in common/lib or shared/lib?
If not, try to put everything in your webapps/WEB-INF/lib directory.
Even if this would mean to duplicate it for several webapps.
Please give feedback for the results (in positive and negative case)
AspectJ is, in fact, required for my JDBC driver (at least, so it
appears).
The vendor given JDBC-driver requires AspectJ? Which DataBase, which
driver? (this is just for my personal interest).
Also, what I'm developing at the moment is intended to be a framework
that can be used by multiple webapps at once, so common/lib or
shared/lib seemed to make sense...
Even framework JARs should be deployed with the independent webapp.
Diskspace or ease of deployment are less important than errors resulting
from ClassLoader problems.
However, even placing AspectJ in the webapp's WEB-INF/lib directory
gives me the same error.
Did you put everything or just AspectJ in webapp's WEB-INF/lib
directory? Please have a try with everything.
Regards
Boris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
