Hey Mark et. al., On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 at 11:20, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 12/12/2019 15:23, Christopher Schultz wrote: > > Arief, > > > > On 12/12/19 00:25, Arief Hasani wrote: > >> IMHO, being able to override form HTTP1.1 conf is all good as user > >> could easily assume that if not specified in the upgrade than use > >> http1.1 configs > > I'm not sure you understand the question. > > > > Mark is asking if any users in the community are finding that they > > need to independently configure specific parts of the HTTP/<2 versus > > h2 *for the same port*. > > > > Thinks like the compression, keepalives, max headers/trailers, > > timeouts, sendfile config, etc. > > > > Does it ever make sense to have sendFile enabled on the HTTP/1.1 > > connector but disable sendFile if the client upgrades to h2? > > Exactly. > > > The suspicion is that identical configuration is acceptable. Mark is > > trying to ask if there are any exceptions before we simplify the code > > which handles the configuration. > > > > If you have a specific use-case, please explain. > > Just pinging this thread in case there is someone with a specific use case. > > At the moment, I'm leaning towards the simplification for Tomcat 10 > onwards. > It's probably better that way. The change here is big and a major release such as 10.x is more appropriate for GA. > Mark > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
