On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:53 PM Tom Coudyzer <tcdm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the info. > > If you say where we can download the test build we are happy to do that and > see if it makes any difference. > No problem if any (serious) issues can occur, we'll have the fire > extinguishers ready :-) > > Once again many thanks for your help, much appreciated! > Tomcat 9.0.20 has known HTTP/2 issues: - The new async NIO code still had some random bugs that caused connection errors - The timeout issue which caused the connection to be often closed once it hit its window size The current fixed Tomcat looks ok to me with chrome, but if the problem is rare it would be more difficult to reproduce. Rémy > > Regards, > Tom > > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:09 AM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 23/05/2019 09:04, Tom Coudyzer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We analyzed the problem further and we have set up another version > which > > is > > > using Tomcat 9.0.19. We don't have the issue anymore. So it looks like > > it's > > > caused by something that has changed between the two versions. Based on > > the > > > info I have it looks like Chrome is stalling and getting too many > > responses > > > at the same time. In the meantime we activated already the access log > and > > > all files in that file are sent with status 200. So it looks like a > > client > > > / browser side issue. > > > > > > Does this information give more information on what could be causing > the > > > problem or which parameter we should set up / change or do you still > need > > > more information? > > > > Given the issue appears between 9.0.19 and 9.0.20 a Tomcat issue looks > > more likely than a browser issue. > > > > If I point you towards a test build (no guarantees, use at your own > > risk, if your server catches fire don't blame me etc.) for 9.0.21 could > > you test that as there are some HTTP/2 changes in 9.0.20 that made a > > long standing bug more likely that have been fixed in 9.0.21-dev. > > > > If you still see the issue then we can look at specific debug logging > > and/or isolated test cases. > > > > Mark > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 5:01 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On 22/05/2019 15:47, Tom Coudyzer wrote: > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> We wanted to upgrade our application to start using HTTP/2. We added > > the > > >>> necessary and we see that the browser is using HTTP/2 in the > browsers' > > >>> development tools. > > >>> > > >>> However since we activated it we get random CONNECTION_CLOSED 200 > > Errors > > >> in > > >>> Chrome. It's not always on the same files and sometimes there are > more, > > >>> sometimes there are less, sometimes it works. When we disable HTTP/2 > > >>> (remove the upgradeprotocol tag) everything works fine. > > >>> > > >>> We are running Tomcat 9.0.20 (x64) on a Windows Server 2008 R2 > server. > > >>> > > >>> Did we configure something incorrectly, is this an HTTP/2 issue or > > should > > >>> we look at network issues on our end? > > >>> > > >>> If you need more information or we need to run something to be able > to > > >>> troubleshoot it better please let me know. > > >>> > > >>> Help is much appreciated ! > > >> > > >> You can try enabling debug logging if the issue is fairly easy to > > >> reproduce. That might shed some light on what Tomcat is doing and why. > > >> > > >> There are also some HTTP/2 fixes due in the next set of releases that > > >> might help. > > >> > > >> Mark > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > > > > >
