Chris,
I tried your suggestions, but it did not help. Still the same error.
I will now try a complete remove of Java and Tomcat.
Then install Java11 and after that install Tomcat9.

Andre,
I can report that in Tomcat 7 there is no service.bat etc.
But in Tomcat 9 everything is there in the bin folder.

Ralf


Am Di., 27. Nov. 2018 um 09:47 Uhr schrieb André Warnier (tomcat) <
a...@ice-sa.com>:

> On 27.11.2018 01:49, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Andi,
> >
> > On 11/26/18 15:08, Andi Meister wrote:
> >> Tomorrow I will try it on an other machine with no previous Tomcat
> >> installed. But my problem is that I have to get it to run on this
> >> machine. What could I do? First uninstall all jdks and Tomcats and
> >> then install jdk11 and newest Tomcat?
> >
> > You might want to:
> >
> > 1. C:...\tomcat-7> bin\service.bat remove  (optional name parameter)
> >
> > 2. C:...\tomcat-9> bin\service.bat install (optional name parameter)
> >
> > Something might be broken in the service definition, and this should
> > reset everything. Note that any of the system properties you might
> > have defined in the existing service will be wiped-out by this
> > process. So, you might want to take a few screenshots of the various
> > configuration screens if you are using anything other than the plain
> > defaults.
> >
> > Hmm... just realized that the service.bat file might not be included
> > in the "installer" bundle. You might have to grab the ZIP bundle from
> > the Tomcat downloads site to get those scripts.
> >
> > - -chris
>
> This may be the right moment to suggest that this (these ?) ZIP bundle(s)
> could be
> included by default, when running the installer (not unpacked, just copied
> along and
> dropped somewhere).  For as long as I can remember (which is getting
> somewhat shorter
> these days, but still goes back to tomcat 4.x), this has been an issue
> which regularly
> crops up with the Windows versions : whenever something goes wrong, people
> are being
> referred to files that they do not have, and it always takes a while to
> explain, download
> etc..
> It would be easier if the files were already there anyway.
> In the past, there may have been a concern for the extra size of the
> download (nowadays
> about 11 MB for each 32/64 bit version), but compared to many other
> downloads nowadays,
> this is still quite reasonable.
> (And in fact, there are many common files, so not everything would have to
> be downloaded.
>   Also the 32-bit version is less useful these days.)
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to