Hey Anthony,

your last comment seems to indicate that you disagree with tomcat being
fixed requirement. Personally I feel opening a port and implementing all
the protocol handling completely negates of advantages of having tomcat in
your application. So maybe you should force a change in your requirements
instead of undermining them, if you feel they are nonsense.

That being said, if you need a binary protocol on top of http you might
want to check grpc. I am not sure how well it works with tomcat, there
might be issues, since they use netty for default. The advantage of grpc
would be multi-language support, http2 features, and the convenience that
no-one ever got fired for using google technology.

regards
Leon



On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 2:49 AM anthony berglas <anth...@berglas.org> wrote:

> We would like to run a binary protocol in a Tomcat container, so that
> binary sent to a specific port all ends up in a specific servlet. This is
> not AJP, we do not want Tomcat itself to look at the bits, just pass them
> through.
>
> So in Tomcat parlance we need a special Connector.
>
> Does such a thing exist or do we need to write it ourselves?
>
> Tomcat itself is a fixed requirement for the container architecture. Just
> having a process listening on a port is not considered to be enterprisy
> enough.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Anthony
>
> --
>
> Dr Anthony Berglas, anth...@berglas.org       Mobile: +61 4 4838 8874
> Just because it is possible to push twigs along the ground with ones nose
> does not necessarily mean that that is the best way to collect firewood.
>

Reply via email to