-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Shawn,
On 3/27/18 8:41 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote: > So now I have one person telling me that removeAbandoned DOES > close connections, and another saying that it does NOT close > connections. Is there a conflict here, or are both of these > statements correct for different pool implementations? Phil knows what he's talking about; I apparently do not. I guess I've just never pushed DBCP over the hump to start actually closing connections on me. From my perspective, they stayed open and idle until either a service restart or they were closed by the long-running process in the small number of cases where this kind of thing happened. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlq76GMACgkQHPApP6U8 pFigoQ//bHTHAuTFmh1AZ59wqLLoqw+9jvsBxiIgM731bLCEnyOP0pmRpE/KTDtP PIvdDPZu61xyq2ZRBTKEIZPipNyxeqCkC5TwdzmEtIokCilKmX5iwteihoQAHs0d YnGi0+Ei0Sl7FQxj8r5vqMeaNpzjrwmZF/Cq9JVys1rlQpHfEdXjv1OImUtn5Evp xNtWHfGodRrZ2MI8LXLQZixHmVo7/MsykBTEtgKU/xyL9/W8mqv0NYvTbWN3R0I8 G/fbxR6BEzyBGyK3wT0QPNiF/F4SRtMX8JmaaKTDQUSM5JH7I3lGdItdfo3PpDVM MmW/VrS+mDVi1JF1VHsiGvDY3tVat/i4ijt9xIrEJI9ycoEUhAygp+lLlITd3+4h 1H3jqTEP5Pjgfn0K7yPl5sgzrJBI5ct8b9Xw6Au6uWCYHCPf4ONRl3EL7z6sNpiG OgHmh9xwIDDQ4y0K1aNQs3aQNBm8+x9Wnp5RwJXO0VZmNusRXD8627kDeZE31ejZ tq/ImZuaVo6knrttMTpLB4PuFZLVcX5/3Q1ZGQM4ZxEJonLVh5JX51V8ajdk1CHd SV2ZMHEnoYOn2wQPA3Wl1VKWCR0oQLpEKCzP00ci09mF4SS5Q5fo3VdIe1ge9ieR +MFUBteVKvf1vZCqbBN2XHl57jNTBiMZ75vdqvMDvKziEQ73QEA= =773e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
