-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Coty,
On 11/30/17 3:51 PM, Coty Sutherland wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Christopher Schultz > <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: Naga, > > On 11/30/17 12:29 PM, Naga Ramesh wrote: >>>> Thanks Chris.. >>>> >>>> See the below output and here not showing the secure. >>>> >>>> < HTTP/1.1 200 OK < Set-Cookie: >>>> JSESSIONID=D14ACAB7CADB83FAD5C11296C75A09DB; Path=/; HttpOnly >>>> < X-Frame-Options: DENY < X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff < >>>> X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block < Content-Type: >>>> text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 < Content-Length: 5472 < Date: >>>> Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:26:37 GMT < Server: > > HTTP response headers don't say anything about "secure" anyway. Agreed. I'm trying to get the OP to tell us what the desired behavior is, AND what the experienced behavior is instead. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJRBAEBCAA7FiEEMmKgYcQvxMe7tcJcHPApP6U8pFgFAlohg68dHGNocmlzQGNo cmlzdG9waGVyc2NodWx0ei5uZXQACgkQHPApP6U8pFiKRQ//cIHsFTqPtENcTW1J GevSMuh3LCjTTFs+3GJhmJ2FM+DL3C6+KosoFRRrr6NWhch9/Wxt4gdKO+7qimVV 0Q5TUXn7yypZzkrrWmqNrOODdDabe9nGg9L3eslyKOy3mjJHYyPn/bIbGbZmU866 wn1ltAozt7pwsLOI3RT1wK+1ZgKs+fAUHBdup7zV/G0E2wtXyFU2RzYUAF7UmSY6 5282/oIhBgDsLkcXHDjGAMiasgLNEKMBLmP+6f57MsIlKToFMP+tHWKF/28sqx2P NYC61d0nmSLyHPZ/YarepkSqN9EyYakrzQzJDWjMyNk2KILF55ZHAWuv9oP7aFBm /p0OkqWLhtV+a4ay2p9l2qKagObh57hZFzobgdUmId0SCqfgGdSxDmevK37pUJ/R GOoRUS/7vMfiXV8z+b0sdVgAjrHZ71wgiJqqaCdEmYZDTp+Z8kk1xvkPGzB+DMuQ DZJfZ0IEXaDV+GREFUW8nrTrcifmmF5TjtZlBHJuG0MoJsUBkSo8C1vFuSR2GDBO Axe4BV6hUAuFJDpcnsUEU2lh5DjJ59hVRplqDgNFFG5EuroNDr+M5wujSsue3Lot veGATKRmBiW7lq77qCVCtXuU4fPMCpiiE3rOrMaJHvdgB9Dj1BbnO8QKs93gboNf r2z1QYMAmWBsibnjLpnWulio508= =NypD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
