Am 08.11.2016 um 10:01 schrieb André Warnier (tomcat):
On 08.11.2016 09:47, Christoph P.U. Kukulies wrote:
Am 07.11.2016 um 19:09 schrieb Caldarale, Charles R:
From: Christoph P.U. Kukulies [mailto:k...@kukulies.org]
Subject: Re: war file incompletely deployed
This makes sense somehow, but wouldn't a local move or copy from
within
the server's filesystem have the same complications?
No, a local mv or rename in a modern file system simply changes the
directory structure;
no copy is performed. A copy does stand a chance of being caught in
the middle, but the
timing window is much, much smaller. Best to use mv/rename whenever
possible.
- Chuck
So 'touch' a .LCK file in a place outside webapps, copy over the
file, when copy done
remove the .LCK file.
On the server a background process is running watching for the .LCK
file. when it's
gone, it does the 'mv'.
(a mv can imply a copy though when it goes across filesystems on
different drives).
Would it not be simpler to just rename the .war file, to .war.lck,
then copy it to the destination, then rename it (in place) to .war
when the copy is finished ?
Tomcat should not even consider .war.lck files, right ?
Ah, yes, forgot about that, that Tomcat wouldn't eat anything that's
being thrown at it :)
--
Christoph
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
