Am 15.05.2015 um 20:23 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Mark,

On 5/15/15 12:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 15/05/2015 17:49, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Tony,

On 5/15/15 12:06 PM, PerfGuru wrote:
Good news thanks for the update. It may be some time before
servlet 4 support is released but good to know Tomcat will be
ready then. But does APR support http/2? I know other web
servers now do.

Mark's initial work on the HTTP/2 connector has been using APR.
Note that APR doesn't handle the HTTP protocol, it just helps
manage sockets, pools, etc. The protocol needs to be built on top
of those building blocks. Please see the dev list (archives) for
details. Just search for "HTTP/2" subjects.

Correct. This is primarily because ALPN support is not there in
JSSE yet and wont be until Java 9. That said, one of the reasons
for the huge amount of connector refactoring that I did before
starting on HTTP/2 was so that the connector implementation
specific code was kept to a minimum (so far just ALPN). HTTP/2 will
work just fine with NIO and NIO2 just as soon as JSSE support ALPN
and we plumb it in.

Is this something that's workable with the current pre-release builds
of Java 9? Presumably, Servlet 4 will require Java 8. Does that mean
that HTTP/2 with the NIO connectors will only be available with a
higher JRE version?

h2c support (HTTP/2 over a cleartext channel via HTTP upgrade
rather than TLS) is also on the TODO list. It shouldn't be much
work to add (less than a day) and it wil be available for all
connectors.


Also, I think Tomcat supports websockets which has the
important capabilities that http/2 has and has been available
longer.

Tomcat supports Websocket since Tomcat 7, as long as you are
running on Java 7 or higher.

Depending upon your strategy you might want to go with that or
wait a couple of years for http/2. Remember the firewalls,
proxies and other network systems have to support http/2 before
it can reach Tomcat. So it may be by the time http/3 is
approved.

Tomcat has no choice (application developers do). Servlet 4.0 will
require HTTP/2 so Tomcat has to support it.

Correct. Using Websocket through certain proxies (e.g. httpd) is
even still sometimes tricky.

Yeah. We should touch base with jimjag and discuss this. I think
the httpd thinking around WebSockets and the Java world thinking
about WebSockets aren't quite lined up.

+1

Perhaps there isn't much use for Websockets in the Perl or PHP world,
where a lot of httpd installations are being used.

Jim Riggs's (reprise, I believe) presentation at ApacheCon about how
"mod_php needs to die" (paraphrasing) advocates more extensive use of
mod_proxy_* to physically separate the web tier from the application
tier, in a way that more closely resembles how Java webapps are
deployed. Perhaps if the world starts listening to the Jim Riggses of
the world, the shortcomings of mod_proxy_websocket and friends will
become more apparent.

Do you see any problems using a HTTP/2 enabled proxy in front of Tomcat HTTP or AJP connectors? Combining httpd with mod_h2 and mod_jk should give us enough time for Servlet 4.0 - assuming that the critical slow bandwith, high latency path between the client and the proxy benefits most of the new procotol.

- Stefan


--
Mayr Stefan

Hausen - Gassenaecker 10
82269 Geltendorf

Tel.: 08193 - 9979469

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to