On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Christopher Schultz < ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Sean, > > On 2/20/15 4:10 PM, Sean Dawson wrote: > > We have a GWT app deployed to tomcat (7_59) and fairly often when > > we send a bunch of request quickly we're seeing undefined methods > > in the logs - and the calls fail, causing issues with our app. We > > make calls via RestyGwt (latest version) but GwtRequests all show > > this - both though after a number of REST calls in a short period > > of time. So for example... > > > > [ip-addr] - - [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] "DELETE /path1 HTTP/1.1" > > 200 304 [ip-addr] - - [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] "DELETE /path2 > > HTTP/1.1" 200 310 [ip-addr] - - [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] > > "DELETE /path3 HTTP/1.1" 200 307 [ip-addr] - - > > [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] "undefinedDELETE /path4 HTTP/1.1" 501 > > 304 [ip-addr] - - [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] "DELETE /path5 > > HTTP/1.1" 200 304 [ip-addr] - - [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] > > "DELETE /path6 HTTP/1.1" 200 310 [ip-addr] - - > > [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] "DELETE /path7 HTTP/1.1" 200 307 > > [ip-addr] - - [20/Feb/2015:15:24:34 -0500] "undefinedDELETE /path8 > > HTTP/1.1" 501 304 > > > > Similarly... > > > > ... .... "undefinedPOST /gwtRequest HTTP/1.1" 501 1136 > > > > Very little info online, but did come across this old bug... > > > > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 > > > > In fiddler, the headers are identical between the requests that > > work and those that fail. Resending the failed request completes > > normally. > > > > So far we've only be able to reproduce this when using Internet > > Explorer (10 & 11) and we've spent a lot of time trying to figure > > out what's going on - but have been unable. Any > > pointers/explanations? > > Which connector? Can you post the configuration for that? > > <Connector port="8080" protocol="HTTP/1.1" connectionTimeout="20000" redirectPort="8443" asyncTimeout="35000" /> > Any reverse proxy (e.g. Apache httpd) involved? If yes, is the above > from Tomcat's access log or the web server's? > No, tomcat logs. > > - -chris > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU56XyAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYidsQAKnX6H5IxY1cIW1fN8F0oAH3 > WRux2sUvj2AGJTC1hUcKBSjwboEd+V0JOQOpoYqzPSWpSQkhD3FXgnSFjFZTk3G9 > mgGohyk4o8KUldYnlRnT3RukauV9z+ZdrAEE3rM5ie9r+LnsmcMcY9bwlRm6Ua8+ > E6utVB6raitZNnAm5a+TmJySczvabhlzyv5/ORMTUK0/yALIrIGZ0+e6EQXHRFOB > /+BY2SENvSlw/qI/hEIIRKLnK270oGavfybjKHu4t+kjKsNdfJHu3arkfsvr2+u9 > z6/Hb+46XRY6YaMLCeEocXecAuVLL6QWndquT/b/kSao5/hWbn6NlFLiQEZGaj0M > qkrySOhCfURUeyh/QJ2iroyX27VqPRanbqxypEE3hhSy9aRiCQOedMsnjO+8h0Xm > n7f/VaZJxNYwSn34tghd286X2vorl9rzTGF/mOX7fXp/ZEd3jB6NTSWqeeisJaBF > t1MHhVK4qvThrpj7ZX5MPpN8HrHc5dnJ5gl8VCa/e5Bwz73QfEumECoMdMbnvK4v > a4svfOITrzUMrJXesqknfA18jrROvy/JnYc9r4dLgx/vquQaqfbF33uTrwU64F6M > /ZCZ0w9q75QaaZDyCgzLTYanqQxK84hi9RPYCXYxKzjDiIZ1BdBAUS+HC+VEPI1v > WxWikxmugyodrx4XK5ci > =mb5/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org > >
