-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 All,
I've been using both BIO and NIO connectors for quite some time, now. A few years back, Mark Thomas suggested that the NIO connector was solid enough and offered significant advantages over the BIO connector which is definitely true. The only thing about the NIO connector is that it's a bit wasteful for blocking reads because the blocking is "simulated" since all reads are in fact non-blocking. The "simulated" blocking comes from issuing a non-blocking read request and waiting for the data to come back, which introduces a bit of overhead not encountered with the BIO connector. The recently-added NIO2 connector solves this problem by using genuine blocking reads and writes for the request and response body. Is anyone using the NIO2 connector in any significant use case? If so, what are your experiences? Thanks, - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU5jzRAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYDqcQAKKZq28e3Kf6OUeJGOjpSLzI G128fE8HzshD3HjNIe3gmkXR4oRdAHAyQ7z1n8u2ChUN76crXpoVsucEh9ialxxM ZtaOXYQZMkE0QAKqcUvgPezw2YlA+Gcy3QrL/H8C8e2gwKeHaSMCUgwDBMXY4oxK /wsM9/tMnQ3C6duN+GIzHq+POaoHvIw74wSLFX2XT9V00OCo4t826ChSrPdX2BKu c9l1AlNSbDTFWj/iOVmPN8b1a5Qdp+Hm+9DSsyaodr3wSfmUKMmGIuBMJ0HlQgYf rLFUT8hgvBy3mn55hoiTCdgesn92p5Vif4QZl+szC28FtxCEjUW8If2Oe8z3UJIR cjAjFv4UPpM2feR0z6tIaZmmzH1fUnK84Zy/yb2/5tVJ8SkREaT0tIQSIv3GBiVf 333TI9681u3hIg2drPMD0wWZWw+jaxrKVkRyCHfkLfgcAciGxMlZJCvRNyQfqm16 G1qB4EfnPvrwph5HzZG5JTdVvJgdTnd+Z60mKCYmJj1aixLzJge7phToeGdRMA8c CCAVXCGzkPAPbiLUgmuoDDwrQ8uKNJW2j7Oi0xbLCjKrygNiIrGWwnJAetUvKY8v sALwGhD59WzUrTwWyZPEFUe/8LwphT/mCVjORMx2yRUo4OaMy//iuCIuEnFqdmr0 jkdgeAJ6Xmp1jJxdxxCl =OatJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
