On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Diego Ruotolo <druot...@noemalife.com>
wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
>
>
> Working on my company webapp I notice the following problem: sometimes the
> jsession cookie is lost, and therefore my whole http session is lost.
>
>
>
> The context is:
>
> - Tomcat v. 5.5.36
>
>                - JDK 1.5.0
>

Both of these pieces of software are very old and no longer supported.
There are very likely bugs and security issues in them which will never get
fixed.  You should consider upgrading ASAP.  As a bonus, upgrading may
solve the problem you're having.

  http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-55-eol.html

Dan


>
> - O.S. Windows
>
> - Client: Internet Explorer 8
>
>
>
> Here is my use case:
>
> -              I made a POST request to a servlet of my webapp
>
> -              While processing this request, I create a new http session
>
> -              Processing of the request will process a velocity template
> as last step
>
> -              This velocity template contains 3 calls to 3 different
> servlets of my webapp, these 3 calls are made through an HTTP GET
>
> -              While processing one of these 3 requests, Tomcat does not
> append jsessionid parameter to the requested URL: I have debugged Tomcat
> classes therefore I am sure of this
>
>
>
> This problem does not occur always, but just sometimes. While debugging
> Tomcat classes, I noticed that Tomcat starts 3 threads to manage the 3 GET
> requests of the velocity template, so maybe it is a concurrency problem.
>
> Finally, I noticed that this problem does not happen if I set the Windows
> registry key HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main – TabProcGrowth
> to 0 or 1, which forces Internet Explorer to use one process for all tabs,
> not one process for single tab (which is the default).
>
>
>
> Do I miss some configuration settings? Do I have to set some particular
> parameter / cookie in the first response (or in the velocity template) ?
>
> If you need more details please tell me.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advice,
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Diego
>

Reply via email to