-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Konstantin,

On 1/22/14, 9:03 AM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
> Hi Jeffrey,
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: Jeffrey Janner
>> [mailto:jeffrey.jan...@polydyne.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 21,
>> 2014 10:19 PM
> 
>> Eureka, I finally figured it out! It was a real eureka moment,
>> some remembrance burned its way up from my subconscious and I had
>> the answer. Ready guys?  Really surprised no one mentioned it. It
>> was Windows F-ing Firewall!!!!!
> 
> Good to hear that you could find and solve the problem.
> 
> (Off topic:)
> 
>> I HATE WINDOWS!!!!!!
> 
> What I can't quite understand is, how one can "hate" Windows or its
> "F-ing" firewall, if they just do what they were configured to
> do...     ;-)
> 
> When setting up the Windows Firewall, I normally only create rules
> for specific (TCP) ports, not for specific executables, so that the
> firewall allows connections to a TCP port regardless of what the
> name or path of the executable is.

Actually, as surprising as it can sometimes be, I find that the
Windows firewall is better than iptables *because* it /can/ do things
like this. You can make your system a bit safer.

For instance, if your server is compromised (yes, I know, once you're
owned, you're owned) and the attacker installs some malware of some
kind, that malware will not be able to bind to a port or even make
outgoing connections, even on "standard" outgoing ports -- for
instance HTTP.

Lots of malware connects to external C&C servers to give instructions,
and the Windows wirewall makes it easy to prevent that from happening
even when ports like 80 are used -- and typically left wide-open on
servers.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=tJQA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to