-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Bob,
On 12/13/13, 8:12 AM, Bob DeRemer wrote: > Hi Mark (et al), While Mark is one of the most likely to respond, please address your questions only to the community.... at least at first ;) > We’re seeing really high CPU utilization with just a 1000 active > websockets that are sending/receiving 100 byte binary messages. > The profiling snippet below was with 1000 connections. If we start > to increase the number of connections, the time spent in the NIO > logic starts to consume the majority of the processing. For those trying to play-along at home (who haven't been keeping their configuration up-to-date with yours), what is your current <Connector> configuration? How are you observing CPU usage? Do you have thread dumps and/or profiling data you can share with us? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJSq5W4AAoJEBzwKT+lPKRY5BcQAJFEinaGtvPUs+AyNkZ45Agf go6esNq1xmKVejLq899KxeF+kPGfBUO3e8WO4abYiz5S1bd0Sqfo9I9i5h1EF7bg HupcRlGKFrq3/YlCwe49QFkShk3CMCx6MtlWmoTbeL4ZNKkKQFDMbQDreJ3Gj8pd pwkR8CFg/MvGPJWrhBRNOh9/mP+1tUfOizyLpr9qC9pPJ3X42IuocsFuhZ9uiGNv gdOgfBI85XaIefuKWUlzTnqovozhQcLtpg3brsbhF6RxL92SYBE2aSPz53378B2H /4KwnTkISJdLObm9/k1qxigQroJ0GOsaTpqoEYdhbNn9YYKovaKYM4c3hehS6QfA wx1rwtN4j/t8T96W/Rp7UrL0uxmRwvs+QJB1lDWTD4+Cp0elsTgDU91K3b9r8I64 ZnG7Z4Kep2x23ybcnksMvgzQvQiUntaUY4Q44cF0FTw5S0+hCD8t7ov3mMl4IrHX 2y+rRkgylNi2wiDOI5XHPQB/UYG3FmDy9hSce68jqvmy9gGOBmt7kcKsxaVvRqaJ WXX97SLL91gNbVZ0UY1X5N18C0X/Hr4p8LYJ6hDf8L4JAgO8wVGGjPrFY3GvHxXv S+W3JOKqo9jCukWhdPTmxVGfWWEuvv3LoYZ3d0yaHdMvojq9bfMYW8rCU1+1x+HT QOkC/NVl2a5doe3qCWwL =wv12 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
