On Aug 2, 2013, at 12:42 PM, Nick Williams wrote:

> 
> On Aug 2, 2013, at 12:05 PM, Igor Urisman wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> I'm looking into a solution that will make extensive use of websockets.
>> Details are unimportant, but here's the question that I'd like to have some
>> insight into.  The current implementation (official
>> example<http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc7.0.x/trunk/webapps/examples/WEB-INF/classes/websocket/chat/ChatWebSocketServlet.java?revision=1354477&view=markup>)
>> seems independent of the JSR
>> 356<http://docs.oracle.com/javaee/7/tutorial/doc/websocket.htm>.
>> Is work underway to implement the javax.websocket.* objects, or is what's
>> in org.apache.catalina.websocket it for the enforceable future?
> 
> Tomcat 8 has a completed (though not yet fully tested and vetted) 
> implementation of JSR-356. We're voting right now on the developer's mailing 
> list whether to release Tomcat 8.0.0-RC1 alpha.
> 
> Though Tomcat 8 is the only Tomcat that will support the Servlet, JSP, and EL 
> specifications included in Java EE 7 (they will not be back-ported to Tomcat 
> 7), a decision was made a while ago to deprecate the existing Tomcat 7 
> WebSocket implementation and back-port JSR-356 to Tomcat 7. This is the only 
> Java EE 7 component that will be back-ported to Tomcat 7, AFAIK. I don't 
> personally know this will happen (I'm not one of the developers), but since 
> the JSR-356 implementation in Tomcat 8 is complete now, it shouldn't be too 
> long.

**I don't personally know WHEN this will happen…

> 
> If you want to play with the JSR-356 implementation for now, feel free to 
> download and use Tomcat 8 RC1 when it releases in (hopefully) the next few 
> days. We encourage it, because the more people who download it and try it 
> out, the better our chances of chasing down and fixing bugs now instead of 
> after a general release.

You could also download the POTENTIAL release candidate that is being voted on 
right now 
(https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.0-RC1/bin/), but I 
can't guarantee that this is the actual release candidate that will come out.

> 
> Nick

Reply via email to