-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Chirag,
On 5/23/13 1:21 PM, Chirag Dewan wrote: > With c=1 it is 70k req/sec and with c=2 it is 35k in both i.e the > total req/sec cannot be scaled beyond 70k. With Tomcat 6 it is 60k > in both clients i.e total of 120k. > > I do not expect more than 75k req/sec being served by Tomcat 7,but > its the benchmark set by Tomcat 6 which I can't overlook. As I said > I wouldn't have mind 80-90 % utilization on peak load,but its the > already running server performance which I am compelled to follow > or even carry out more. What do you see when you attach a profiler to Tomcat while you run your load tests against it? (Now that you have removed your own webapp from the mix and are just fetching trivial resources). - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRnpAFAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRY91AQAJicVT7nLNBzr4m7eqOs6sRn R+hCNT37A0HWS8+A8Ns52FyCUUmOljrFVP8LcwA1J0IXFxxI1GvCGNdL7y8248dF cWKyyMYUpmiGbwRBcz0XTvxJoGLwo55Wv7pnYsdecU7d93epXcPSZTQHM3zI82ZB TEShV/AHigcnA9mEe8NV1XgLzCZclh9mjfP2uIhhBHvNkoK3gX0oMey8xK9lezlJ ArGKy1RUNsvnWaDvmFC5o5FQyh8CPDnxXalGgDKnjxFHQfUOtCXaFdWdgeiPL6xn TPiuWIEdqNXERLAjY9IjXzoXpBkxRcYPEwN4V3/tHZapw6C7M9OmcmuXMfhF5UEP G4e+nhcy2CtdUum38j4g1LLEB06QRmc1DIt6czb3kqKQR3FTBpRSkBdWEjJhZnxU JVRIYiK8rOqxXygJcga0VlI5xSIzHh2JK7qlT6rc+zqWQTHXOFkmxyGMfjb+hx+i Mofp0lrO9aczFopb/C3uF7gOAb5c0hhhf1Smxvy9nCl2YscA+BarhWdwiOeEGd+6 mNTK/unQIZLJI3Sqb8xgaaGoa5FEvfoaRptweiqON76hNZGrFDxCnQeG9h6W12uW CGQfEWnbgmWkao/ZrIGYkxmRQNd7n4w2jEfzxdD40yrDX+jyQ7VbWrKkX/m/0K+b 7h8osL0Vaqk+GtaWfuPA =cRWt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
