-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Jeffrey,

On 4/22/13 4:18 PM, Jeffrey Janner wrote:
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message----- From: André Warnier
>> [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2013 7:03 PM To:
>> Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: two responses from one request -
>> how is it possible ?
>> 
>> Jakub 1983 wrote:
>>> http://www.mulesoft.com/tomcat-connector states:
>>> 
>>> Using the current arrangement, both Connectors will pass all
>>> requests to the same Engine, which will in turn pass all these
>>> requests to
>> both
>>> of its contained web applications.  This means that each
>>> request will potentially generate two responses, one from each
>>> application. <Server> <Service> <Connector port="8443"/> 
>>> <Connector port="8444"/> <Engine> <Host name="yourhostname"> 
>>> <Context path="/webapp1"/> <Context path="/webapp2"/> </Host> 
>>> </Engine> </Service> </Server>
>>> 
>>> Is it really true what they write ?
>>> 
>> 
>> (For anyone else reading this, I did look at the indicated
>> webpage, and it is really what they say there)
>> 
>> To me, it sounds like utter nonsense. Or else, I need to revise
>> my whole understamding of HTTP and Tomcat.
>> 
>> It even looks like nonsense squared, since :
>> 
>> - each request is sent by one client on one connection to one
>> port (meaning one Tomcat Connector), and the (single) response to
>> that request will also come back on that same connection - each
>> request should have a target URL (like /webapp1 OR /webapp2, but 
>> not both), and will be processed (once) by the application
>> (context) corresponding to that URL, and will generate only one
>> response
>> 
>> Maybe we should ask the author of that page for more details.  He
>> may have invented the amplifier version of Tomcat.
>> 
>> Additionally, it is really bad practice to put <Context> elements
>> in the server.xml file.
>> 
> 
>> From the article:
> " Using the current arrangement, both Connectors will pass all
> requests to the same Engine, which will in turn pass all these
> requests to both of its contained web applications.  This means
> that each request will potentially generate two responses, one from
> each application."
> 
> Well, after noting some of the bad grammar in the opening few
> paragraphs (listen to vs. listen on), I was going to give the
> author a pass on the use of "both" in the first sentence, instead
> of "either" or "one of".  But then he goes onto the second sentence
> and proves that he meant both.
> 
> In actuality, he should have stopped the first sentence at
> "Engine", and then continued with a new sentence (keeping in mind
> the simplified structure): "The Engine will then see if the first
> string after the hostname portion of the request URL matches any of
> the defined contexts. If a match is found, then the request is
> passed to that context and the response is sent back via the
> original connector.  If a match is not found, then an error is
> returned."
> 
> Of course, after reading the original, I now understand why I was
> never tempted to even try this company's version of Tomcat, despite
> the number of times they've promoted themselves on the list.

Jason Brittain used to work at MuleSoft: they /are/ legit, though this
particular post seems to require some serious editing, or even deletion.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=9dXu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to