On 17/02/2013 16:54, André Warnier wrote:
Mike Wilson wrote:

<snip/>

Example 2: path /ä in "binary" Unicode
  GET /.. [0xC3,0xA4]
  request.getRequestURI() -> "/.." [0xC3,0xA4]
  request.getPathInfo()   -> "/ä"

<snip/>

I believe that your example #2 above is simply illegal.
One is not supposed to send such bytes in a URL without URL-encoding them.
That's per the HTTP RFC itself :
RFC 2616 3.2.2 & 3.2.3
(http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.2)
-> RFC 2396 part 2. URI Characters and Escape Sequences
(http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt)

And I believe that the fact that Tomcat is returning the "correct"
translation in the corresponding request.getPathInfo() is purely
accidental, and it could be argued that this is a bug in Tomcat : the
request should probably have been rejected, because the requested URL
was invalid.

+1. It is on my list of things to do to check why this wasn't rejected with a 400 response.

Mark


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to