On 15/08/2012 21:44, llow...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
> Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote on 08/15/2012 03:22:07 PM:
> 
>> From: Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>
>> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
>> Date: 08/15/2012 03:29 PM
>> Subject: Re: Questions about walking the class path
>>
>> On 15/08/2012 21:13, llow...@oreillyauto.com wrote:
>>> The understanding of the actual developer was that the jars would
> already
>>> be loaded by the JVM and shouldn't need to be re-opened.
>>
>> That understanding is no longer correct. See:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1343708
>>
>> I am not aware of any requirement that requires that class loaders cache
>> everything they load in memory.
>>
> 
> Thank you for the quick response, it's been a great help.
> 
> Do you have any recommendations on how one might be able to get this
> information in a more efficient manner?

More efficient? Not really. I suspect modifying PsiProbe so it closes
the file handles it opens will be your best short-term solution.

Mark

> Our main test environment runs I think close to 100 apps now and has at
> least 4,000 jars in those WARs.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> This communication and any attachments are confidential, protected by 
> Communications Privacy Act 18 USCS ยง 2510, solely for the use of the intended 
> recipient, and may contain legally privileged material. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please return or destroy it immediately. Thank you.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to