Right, the correct syntax is to replace 'balancer' with the worker name. In my 5.5.12 configuration I use 3 workers, 1, 2 and 3 and a balancer worker, 0. # worker.worker0.balance_workers=worker1,worker2,worker3 worker.worker0.sticky_session=true #may be default
In conf/server.xml I have different AJP 1.3 Connector entries, one for each worker (1, 2, 3) port. # <Connector port="8009" enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8443" protocol="AJP/1.3"> ... In httpd.conf, I map all (most) context paths to worker0. # /context1/* worker0 /context2/* worker0 My advice is to keep things as simple as possible. HTH, Long www.edgesoft.ca ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Vahid Hedayati wrote: > > Nah no good > > > > I added in 3 lines after trying the first one and none of it does anything > > different as in it still keeps changing session ID's :( > > > > worker.balancer.sticky_session=true > > This is by default. > > > worker.worker1.balancer.sticky_session=true > > worker.worker2.balancer.sticky_session=true > > > > ??? > worker.worker-name.directive=value > > Anyhow, seems you have two workers named > worker1 and worker2. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]