I'm guessing the reason its in the spec is so that hardware load balancers
can map sessions back to the originating machine.

George Sexton
MH Software, Inc.
http://www.mhsoftware.com/
Voice: 303 438 9585
  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Bethke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 3:19 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Why can the JSESSIONID name not be changed?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I hope this is the right list to ask; if not, please direct me to a  
> better place...
> 
> We're currently integrating a couple of web sites under a single  
> domain.  Some of the sites run on separate Tomcats, others use PHP,  
> Perl or a number of proprietary systems.  We believe that having  
> multiple containers use the same session cookie will lead to problems.
> 
> So we assumed that we could just configure each container to use a  
> separate cookie.  However, the specification points out in section  
> SRV.7.1.1SRV.7.1.1 that "[t]he name of the session tracking cookie  
> must be JSESSIONID."
> 
> I'd like to understand the rationale for this requirement. If the  
> container manages the session, why would an application care about  
> the actual mechanism used to track the session? Why can this not be  
> made configurable?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefan
> 
> -- 
> Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Tallence GmbH, Baumwall 3, D-20459 Hamburg, Germany
> Mobile +49 170 3460140, Office +49 40 360935-0, Fax +49 40 360935-10
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to