Sounds like some reconnaissance work is involved by lurking in some requirejs hangouts
Anyone know where is good? That modern ie stuff would have been handy 10 years ago as a f/oss zealot :) I'm on a Mac mainly for shift + cmd + 4 shortcut - great for documentation! On 24/11/2014 10:28 pm, "Charlouze" <m...@charlouze.com> wrote: > I develop on Ubuntu so I can't use ietester. If you need to test things on > ie you can download preconfigured VM (for virtualbox) on modern.ie. > > As for the side effect you are talking about, it's true that it is > sometimes hard to find where does an exception occured because of a > requirejs try/catch during pageinit. > > 2014-11-23 23:54 GMT+01:00 Paul Stanton <pa...@mapshed.com.au>: > > > I find chrome debugger easier to use and faster than firebug. I used > > firebug for years before finding chrome more efficient. > > > > Once everything works in chrome I take it through firefox+firebug, and > > then IE tester for multiple versions of ie (we support 8+). > > > > I rarely find any issues in safari etc that weren't also issues in either > > chrome or firefox. > > > > One side effect of RequireJS seems to be obscure js exceptions or maybe > > i'm still getting used to it. > > > > p. > > > > > > On 20/11/2014 8:30 AM, Chris Mylonas wrote: > > > >> No trying yet, I'm pretty sure firebug/devtools would suffice. > >> > >> My initial request would probably be satisfied with a simple gg search > >> "javascript debugging accordion" and getting lucky with a video of > someone > >> showing their 1337 browser skills - i hadn't imagined remote json > debugging > >> of dom stuff as readily accessible. > >> > >> I bought a couple of bootstrap templates to "cut" them up and tapestry54 > >> them. Also using tomcat for multiple domains I have put up two t54 test > >> sites. > >> > >> http://www.nursepaging.com/FAQ - an accordion that doesn't work, but > as > >> a work around just put a table of contents at the top until I figure it > out. > >> at http://www.businessapps.com.au - clicking on the learn more in the > >> slider should make a pop up appear. > >> > >> The remote debugging seems like overkill....looking at the remote > >> debugging protocol though, it seems all the dev tools have been black > boxed > >> and jsonified - which is really really interesting, particularly > >> https://developer.chrome.com/devtools/docs/protocol/1.1/network > >> > >> Forms with validation from json params is what i'm trying to hammer out > >> for the next tapestry sessions, jsr-303 looks the way to go to keep my > >> templates & codegen simpler. > >> > >> All the goodness of having a web layer like tapestry, but I'm just > >> carving out simple web sites as an exercise to see where I need further > >> study :) I've stayed away from javascript for 10+ years, so it's a bit > >> frustrating!!!! > >> > >> :D > >> > >> Thanks for the links and phrases to search - I'm seeing way more than I > >> bargained for - and this is without even going down the > webrtc/websockets > >> (although remote debugging is all about websockets) rabbit hole! > >> > >> Chris > >> > >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:10:43 +1100, Charlouze <m...@charlouze.com> wrote: > >> > >> Have you tried the remote debugging tool also ? > >>> > >>> 2014-11-18 21:20 GMT+01:00 Chris Mylonas <ch...@opencsta.org>: > >>> > >>> Thanks charlie > >>>> > >>>> That mobile testing is quite extreme/thorough looking. I've just been > >>>> resizing the browser like a caveman hehe > >>>> > >>> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >> > >> . > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > >
