public class YourJavaScriptStack implements JavaScriptStack {
private final AssetSource assetSource;
public YourJavaScriptStack(final AssetSource assetSource) {
this.assetSource = assetSource;
}
// etc
and when you set up a StyleSheetLink, the asset is like this:
assetSource.getClasspathAsset("/META-INF/assets/blahblah.css");
and in AppModule:
public static void
contributeJavaScriptStackSource(MappedConfiguration<String, JavaScriptStack>
configuration) {
configuration.addInstance("YourJavaScriptStack",
YourJavaScriptStack.class);
}
Geoff
On 13 Nov 2014, at 4:33 pm, Paul Stanton <pa...@mapshed.com.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to include some non-requirejs resources in the most recommended
> way. In this case, a javascript package which requires some css.
>
> From what I can tell the recommended approach is to 'shim' it in from the
> location "META-INF/assets", which I've done
>
> public static void contributeModuleManager(MappedConfiguration<String,
> Object> configuration,
> @Path("/META-INF/assets/project/script.js") Resource js)
> {
> configuration.add("project", new JavaScriptModuleConfiguration(js));
> }
>
> I would like the css to live in the same dir.
>
> Since the JS will never be used without the CSS, a stack seems to be the best
> way to include it.
>
> I can easily include the module js in the stack, however since the css asset
> lives in the same location I cannot find a way to correctly create the asset.
>
> From what I can tell the only way to resolve the correct "meta-inf/assets"
> path is via AssetSource.getComponentAsset() however I cannot aquire
> ComponentResources at this point.
>
> Can someone please fill me in on the correct way to create a stack for
> shimmed modules with additional resources?
>
> thanks, p.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
