On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:17:04 -0200, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I've been thinking of a blog post about everything I would do differently
in Tapestry if I had perfect foreknowledge. Trust me, it would be
different, and simpler in many ways ... and based more heavily on
immutability (& controlled mutability) ala Clojure.
Please do it! It'll probably be very interesting. We could learn a lot
from it. :)
Parallel rendering would be nice though not as practical as you'd think
...
Even not thinking it's worth to be included in Tapestry, why wouldn't it
as practical as we (mostly Alex) think? I do think it would have a
negligible gain.
but it would open the door for things like Hysterix (or other forms of
circuit breakers).
Thanks for the Hystrix mention (https://github.com/Netflix/Hystrix). I'd
never heard of that and it seems very insteresting.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
