> Either Element.raw(...) or Element.text(...) Both give me the problems I explained. In a few words they don't create Element nodes but Raw and Text nodes.
I'm not clear why I see all those Element instances containing text but I cannot create one myself (Raw and Text are not Element-s, just Node-s like Element itself) or why I cannot change that Element's text without , but I'll have to assume I just cannot, period, and I can certainly live with that. When I have an Element node with a child Element node, I will just turn that into an Element node with a child Text node instead; I think it will work just fine, I was just trying to clarify my understanding of Element. -----Original Message----- From: Lance Java [mailto:lance.j...@googlemail.com] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 14:14 To: Tapestry users Subject: RE: Customizing the grid to alter its own content Either Element.raw(...) or Element.text(...) On 21 Jul 2014 13:09, "Davide Vecchi" <d...@amc.dk> wrote: > Thanks, that looks like a really good way to use DOM rewriting to > alter grids. > > However if I'm looking at it correctly I think that in > GridCellDecorator.decorate I would still need to be able to set an > Element's text, which I don't know whether it's possible.
