I see, so form 2 is essentially a replica of form 1 accept all the fields are hidden? If that is the case, two final questions, 1 is there a simpler way to setup all them fields? This is a time sheet with probably 50/75 fields. Lastly, when you return form 2, how do you return the object without persisting or losing the values? Sorry lance, just trying to wrap my head around a new approach and get out of the current rut.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com>wrote: > No :) > > Form1 contains the fields. Warnings cause form1's submit to FAIL. > > Form2 is displayed when showing the errors/warnings from form1. Form2 has a > hidden section with ALL of the fields (and values) from form1. Form2's > submit button is likely to be labelled "accept". Clicking the "accept" > button posts form2. The validation of form2 ignores warnings. > On 17 Mar 2014 18:03, "George Christman" <gchrist...@cardaddy.com> wrote: > > > I agree, I try to avoid it as much as I can. I'm not sure I understand > what > > you are doing, are you saying when form 2 is displayed and the submit > > action is clicked, you would then resubmit form 1 along with form 2? > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com > > >wrote: > > > > > As always, I try to avoid persist. I was suggesting hidden (or > disabled) > > > fields in form2 so the values are passed in both submits (thus > > eliminating > > > the need for @Persist) > > > > > > Form2 is not displayed initially, it is displayed when showing the > > warnings > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > George Christman > > www.CarDaddy.com > > P.O. Box 735 > > Johnstown, New York > > > -- George Christman www.CarDaddy.com P.O. Box 735 Johnstown, New York
