On Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:32:52 -0200, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> wrote:

I have a sneaking suspicion that trying to implement this you would end up writing a custom implementation of <script> and eval(...) to achieve
tapestry's current behaviour

Nope, I was thinking of encoding the JavaScript code in the URL, probably in Base64, and write a Dispatcher that would catch these requests, extract the code from the URL and return it. Or store the code in memory, put a token in the URL and use the token to retrieve the stored code.

--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to