On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo <
thiag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Did you notice you use "min-date" in some places and "minDate" in others?
> They should all match.
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:49:22 -0200, George Christman <
> gchrist...@cardaddy.com> wrote:
>
> public static void
>> contributeFieldValidatorSource(MappedConfiguration<String, Validator>
>> configuration, JavaScriptSupport js) {
>> configuration.add("minDate", new MinDate(js));
>> }
>>
>
> minDate
>
>
> public class MinDate extends AbstractValidator<String, Date> {
>>
>> public MinDate(JavaScriptSupport javaScriptSupport) {
>> super(String.class, Date.class, "min-date", javaScriptSupport);
>>
>
> "min-date"
>
Isn't min-date only used as a reference to the .properties file? I'm not
sure why they should match, see tapestry validator below.
https://github.com/apache/tapestry-5/blob/5.4-alpha-29/tapestry-core/src/main/java/org/apache/tapestry5/validator/MinLength.java
Like I pointed out earlier, it works fine with any other data type,
just not Date. I'm not sure if this is a limitation to the validator.
Is there any good way for me to check to figure that out.
>
> @NonVisual
>> @Validate("minDate=test")
>>
>
> minDate
>
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
> http://machina.com.br
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
--
George Christman
www.CarDaddy.com
P.O. Box 735
Johnstown, New York
