On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:43:02 -0300, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I see your point Bob, It could be better the way it is.
My point is if we different version of documentations for different
versions of tapestry. Then we won't bother with broken source code links
since each documentation version will statically refer to it's relevant
source code.
I'm sorry, Muhammad, but that would be hell to maintain. Imagine you wrote
a better description for something. Now you'd had to update at least for
documents for that. (5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 5.4). I'd give an automatic -1 vote on
that. We need to simplify stuff, not complicate them. People would
probably read documentation about the wrong version and not notice. In
addition, in Tapestry 5, things change in non-backward ways in a
veeeeeeery slow pace.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer
http://machina.com.br
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
