I completely agree. If the aim is to help Tapestry then why not do as described 
below by Alessi?

Equally useful, in my opinion, would be to contribute "advanced topic" pages to 
Tapestry's web documentation. You would reach a much bigger audience. You could 
reach them sooner, because the contributions can be incremental. You could be 
responsive and up-to-date, because it's a cinch to modify. 

Besides, you know there's no money in technical books these days, yeah?

Nonetheless, Thiago, I applaud your enthusiasm and your massive ongoing 
contribution to Tapestry.

Cheers,

Geoff

On 07/08/2013, at 4:35 PM, Alessio Gambi wrote:

>> I am not sure that there is enough of an audience for two books.
>> Perhaps you can cooperate with Igor to get your content into his book?
>> There would be a lot of marketing synergy there at least.
> Writing a book is a huge commitment and takes usually a lot of time; and if 
> we consider the fast pace at which T5 is evolving lately I do not think that 
> writing another one-man-book is the best strategy.
> 
> Why don't we -as a community- collaborate towards a Web magazine/journal or 
> any other form of periodic publication ?
> 
> Main reasons that I see in favor of this more flexible (agile if you like):
> 
> - papers are more focused and requires in general less effort than a book. 
> They have a fixed number of pages so authors are 'forced' to just say what it 
> is important... Extensive code and additional examples can be also published 
> somewhere else.
> 
> - articles are cheaper (free if the authors wish) to sell and easier to 
> distribute (google scholar like)
> 
> - several authors can contribute to a single article and several papers can 
> be merged into a more concrete/solid publications (book chapters). Making 
> collaboration a daily activity.
> 
> - committers and other members of the community can contribute also by 
> reviewing the various contributions. This will raise the quality of the 
> publications and will give credibility to them. 
> Remember that peer review is MUST be done in a voluntary fashion for many 
> reasons, 
> I
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to