On Wed, 15 May 2013 17:19:13 -0300, Kalle Korhonen
<kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com> wrote:
If Tapestry IOC would fully implement
the CDI spec, how would it be any different than any other CDI
implementation?
+1 to that. I'd love to see that happening (and, of course, to contribute
for that). The Tapestry-IoC implementation of CDI would probably not be
100% aligned to the spec, but it would be nice to have Tapestry-IoC
benefiting from stuff implemented on the CDI spec, such as transaction
handlers.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
