I host some of our T5 apps on OpenShift.

It has free plan with 512MB RAM and 1GB storage, works good so far, though
I haven't tried it with heavy load yet.

https://www.openshift.com/faq#t6n11275


On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>wrote:

> The only problem with GAE is that GAE expects application launch to be
> cheap, and will often shut down your app until a request comes in.
>  Tapestry assumes a long-running application server, so it can be
> relatively slow to start up: about a second give or take on ordinary
> hardware (not sure about GAE), and possibly a bit longer depending on if
> you are doing anything else expensive at startup, such as using Hibernate.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 8:55 AM, George Christman
> <gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote:
>
> > Barry, are running your app on Tomcat?
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Barry Books <trs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I've run several sites on an Amazon EC2 micro instances which have
> about
> > > 600meg of memory and cost about $10 per month
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Kalle Korhonen
> > > <kalle.o.korho...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > > Tektonic's VPS systems have consistently had most amount of memory
> for
> > > the
> > > > buck and the lowest tier (1GB/$15/month) is nowadays good enough for
> > > > running small T5 apps: http://tektonic.net/virtual-servers.html
> > > >
> > > > Kalle
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jon Williams
> > > > <williams.jonat...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Weill I went from $9/mo all the way up to $30/mo. Tapestry is now
> > > costing
> > > > > me $21 a month. Ok, so if I make $30 a month off tapestry work, my
> > work
> > > > > terrarium will thrive!
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Howard
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Howard Lewis Ship <
> hls...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Well, you can measure this kind of thing with VisualVM.  I'd say
> > you
> > > > want
> > > > > > at least 256MB, with 128MB of PermGen.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jon Williams
> > > > > > <williams.jonat...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd like to know the Minimum Heap Size req'd to run the basic
> > > > Tapestry
> > > > > 5
> > > > > > > archetype example smoothly.
> > > > > > > I am running my war on Jetty in a hosted environment.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Currently I'm running in to issues with 64MB of heap.
> > > > > > > I don't have plans to make this app behave much beyond a static
> > > > > website.
> > > > > > > And I'd like to keep my hosting plan cheap as it's only
> > $9/month. (
> > > > > > > http://jvmhost.com)
> > > > > > > What would you suggest?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > HTTP ERROR 500
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Problem accessing /site/. Reason:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >     GC overhead limit exceeded
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Caused by:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > > > *Powered by Jetty://*
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > > *
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Howard M. Lewis Ship
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Creator of Apache Tapestry
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact
> me
> > > to
> > > > > > learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (971) 678-5210
> > > > > > http://howardlewisship.com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > George Christman
> > www.CarDaddy.com
> > P.O. Box 735
> > Johnstown, New York
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Howard M. Lewis Ship
>
> Creator of Apache Tapestry
>
> The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
> learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!
>
> (971) 678-5210
> http://howardlewisship.com
>



-- 
Dmitry Gusev

AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com

Reply via email to