I've been thinking I may know the reason for what I'm facing but to make
sure I need to confirm something after looking into this piece of code:

org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.services.RegistryShutdownHubImpl.fireRegistryDidShutdown()

This method calls the shutdown listeners one after another, correct ? not
in a threaded way...

Could someone from the dev team confirm that ? Thanks


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:39 PM, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com>wrote:

> addRegistryWillShutdownListener<http://tapestry.apache.org/current/apidocs/org/apache/tapestry5/ioc/services/RegistryShutdownHub.html#addRegistryWillShutdownListener(java.lang.Runnable)>
>  is
> used to contribute methods to be invoked right before proxies\registry are
> destroyed
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Michael Prescott <
> michael.r.presc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> What is 'log', is it an injected logger service?  Once shutdown has
>> started, other services may already have been deactivated, so those calls
>> may fail.
>>
>>
>> On 3 April 2013 16:27, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I use tapestry to develop windows services so this should be similar to
>> a
>> > desktop application I suppose and it's no where close to a web
>> application.
>> >
>> > This method is supposed to register a registryWillShutdownListener
>> >
>> > @Startup
>> > public void startup(RegistryShutdownHub registryShutdown, @IpK final
>> > IMonitoredConfigurationSource ipkConfig, final Logger log) {
>> >     log.info(registryShutdown); // This is called
>> >     registryShutdown.addRegistryWillShutdownListener(new Runnable() {
>> >         @Override
>> >         public void run() {
>> >             log.warn("Announcing shutdown"); // This whole method as if
>> it
>> > doesn't exist !
>> >             ipkConfig.shutdown();
>> >             log.warn("IpkConfig: " + ipkConfig.isShuttingDown());
>> >         }
>> >     });
>> > }
>> >
>> > What is really strange is that *there are other modules being
>> contributed
>> > just like this one and their shutdown listeners act as expected*, except
>> > for this module ! In addition to the first logging call being actually
>> > invoked and I can see it's output in the log files, I can also see the
>> > module contribution message by tapestry so this module is definitely
>> being
>> > loaded, I just don't know why isn't this listener being invoked.
>> >
>> > Are their any other precaution I should consider for my shutdown
>> listeners
>> > to surely work ?
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to