> The code that handles the parameters is in the parameter worker. I think it 
> could be fixed here but it's a bit messy. The real problem is the symbol 
> binding is invariant but you want to set it. Should that be an error or not?  

From looking at the code it's clear the  symbol binding can just ignore the set 
because it only calls the get once. 

I also think it would still work if the symbol binding was invariant. 

To me it's clear how to make it do what I want. The question how should the 
symbol binding work 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to