Using a String param in the service implementation constructor causes a
RuntimeException stating "No service implements the interface
java.lang.String". It is mentioned in multiple places in the documentation
that a String type without the Inject or InjectService annotations will
receive the ServiceId as a "Resource", but, I'm causing this exception
instead.
For an example below is a ServiceBinder call and the service implementation
constructor prototype.
serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class,
> ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId("TestId");
>
serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class,
> ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId("TestId2");
>
>
public ServiceIdAwareImpl(String serviceId)
Shouldn't that constructor receive the ServiceId specified in the withId
method?
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Eynon <steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk
> wrote:
> No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the
> ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation:
>
> http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols
>
> Steve.
>
>
> On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran <e...@elidoran.com> wrote:
> > When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an ID.
> > Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's
> > constructor?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
