I got round this by Munky Patching AbstractTextField so that
final Binding defaultTranslate() {...}
becomes
protected Binding defaultTranslate() {...}
and overriding it in my subclass:
@Override
protected Binding defaultTranslate() {
String description = String.format("default translator,
'teacherKey' of %s", resources.getCompleteId());
return new InvariantBinding(resources.getLocation(),
FieldTranslator.class, description) {
@Override
public Object get() {
return fieldTranslatorSource.createTranslator(resources,
"teacherKey");
}
};
}
Is there any reason for the default translate to be package protected
AND final??
is it okay if I make a JIRA asking for it to be protected scope and
non-final? (It's a 9 character change!)
Steve.
--
Steve Eynon
-------------------------------
"If at first you don't succeed,
so much for skydiving!"
On 25 January 2013 01:26, Steve Eynon <steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk> wrote:
> Here's a puzzler...
>
> I've extended AbstractTextField and I want to set the translate
> @Parameter from within my subclass. Given this parameter is private in
> the superclass, how may I do it?
>
> I went as far as making a mixin to set a bound translate parameter on
> setupRender, e.g.
>
> @BindParameter
> private FieldTranslator<Object> translate;
>
> But that gave this error:
>
> Failure writing parameter 'translate' of component
> Binding InvariantBinding[default translator, parameter value is read-only.
>
> Due to the defaultTranslate in AbstractTextField being a Binding.
>
> final Binding defaultTranslate() {...}
>
> Anyone any ideas?
>
> Steve.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
