On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 17:30:03 -0200, bhorvat <horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Awesome then. I think that before (maybe still, but I think it has moved
from that) tapestry was using some sort of page pool, so that was my
concern.
Tapestry isn't using a page pool since 5.2. In addition, page pool or not,
this doesn't make a difference, as Tapestry always shielded your code from
synchronization problems related to pages and their non-static fields.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
