No, they're not the same: index 9 startIndex 9 rowsPerPage 5 index-startIndex 0 index%rowsPerPage 4 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I did, they are the same. Although modulating tolerates a glitch I'm trying > to understand why is it happening. I have 20 rows per page. The thing is > that, sometimes, the passed index to the getRowValue method is like 0, > while the startindex is 20 ! > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Geoff Callender < > geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 17/12/2012, at 3:10 AM, Muhammad Gelbana wrote: > > > > > Marvelous ! You deserve a medal or something :D > > > Although I know "jumpstart" is a very resourceful project for tapestry > > > beginners including me, I don't why I keep forgetting about it ! May > be I > > > should have it as my homepage instead of google ehehe > > > > > > About the getRowValue(int) method: > > > > > > preparedResults.get(index - startIndex); > > > > > > > > > You think this should work too ? > > > > > > preparedResults.get(index % rowsPerPage); > > > > > > > > > I think both would have the same result. > > > > Try it. I think you'll find the answer is no. > > > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Geoff Callender < > > > geoff.callender.jumpst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> Newly added: a working example using GridDataSource here: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > http://jumpstart.doublenegative.com.au/jumpstart/examples/tables/griddatasources > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> > > >> Geoff > > >> > > >> On 15/12/2012, at 2:46 AM, Lance Java wrote: > > >> > > >>> Basically, the prepare() method is used to fetch the rows between > > >> startIndex > > >>> and endIndex in a single batch and cache them. This cache might be a > > list > > >>> with indexes ranging from 0 to (endIndex - startIndex) > > >>> > > >>> getRowValue(int index) is then used to retrieve a single entry from > the > > >>> batch. This might require you to subtract startIndex from index to > get > > a > > >>> suitable index into your cached batch of records. > > >>> > > >>> getAvailableRows() can be a dynamic value over time. Just make sure > you > > >>> return null from getRowValue() if the index is out of range (ie a row > > has > > >>> been deleted). > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> -- > > >>> View this message in context: > > >> > > > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/5-3-6-GridDataSource-provided-row-index-to-getRowValue-int-tp5718694p5718727.html > > >>> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > >>> > > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > -- Dmitry Gusev AnjLab Team http://anjlab.com
