George, you should be extending SeleniumTestCase and just using plan object-oriented principles to manage your code (e.g you could have some utility clases with utility methods, possibly classes to encapsulate page specific contents, etc). Trying to put your functional test related code into services sounds like a bad idea (e.g. your test infrastructure will be depending on the stuff you're testing).
Cheers - Alex K On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:00 PM, George Christman <gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote: > Hello, I'm very new to the automated testing world and have a couple > questions. I'm wondering what the best practice for setting up reusable > helper methods for testing. Should I be extending SeleniumTestCase with my > own test methods, or should I be using a service? > > If the best way to do this is with a service, how would I get Tapestry > services to work with Tapestry-TestNG and selenium. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry-TestNG-with-selenium-reusable-helper-methods-tp5718524.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > >
