On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:55:35 -0200, Muhammad Gelbana <m.gelb...@gmail.com>
wrote:
It looks like markers aren't sufficient on their own and I still need *
unique* service IDs for each implementation to successfully define my
services.
That's correct..
The only good I can see here is that I do not need to specify the
service ID when injecting the service. So whats the benefit of specifying
one in the first place ?
You've answered yourself just before the question. :) And a marker
annotation is way harder to type incorrectly than a service name (the
compiler will catch that). Relying on strings for doing this kind of stuff
is bad.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
