> Yes I thought about that.... But anyway it should work but my approach... I don't agree. Tapestry doesn't have enough information to know which order to apply the advices. There are possibly other bytecode manipulation issues to consider too.
> I actually hope to have Modules developped by 3rd Parties in the future That's the beauty of IOC contributions. 3rd party modules can contribute to your services. It's been dubbed "distributed configuration" and in my opinion is one of Tapestry IOC's killer features over Spring IOC. -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Several-Advices-on-same-service-tp5716615p5716619.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
