My apology, correcting a few things in my example, was being rushed for lunch.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:36 AM, George Christman <gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo [via > Tapestry] <ml-node+s1045711n5715610...@n5.nabble.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:16:28 -0300, George Christman >> <[hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5715610&i=0>> >> wrote: >> >> > He say's what I'm calling a factory is actually a service locator and >> > that AutoMateParser should be defined as a service in the AppModule. >> >> Yep . . . >> >> > He also stated the objects I use to pass in through the constructor now >> >> > need to be passed in through set methods >> >> This isn't correct for Tapestry and not even for Spring. Both support >> injection through constructors. >> >> Thiago, could you elaborate on this a little bit? I've seen in the app > module you can define a builder method that takes in some service args > > public static SomeService someServiceBuilder(Service1 service1, Service2 > service2) { > return new SomeService(service1, service2); > } > > I wasn't aware you could pass in non service objs into the method. In my > case I have an entity called ImportTask.class. I'm populating the > ImportTask from a hibernate criteria query. > > @Inject > private AutoMateParser autoMateParser; > > ImportTask importTasks = (ImportTask) session.get(ImportTask.class, > DatabaseConstant.AUTOMATE_PARSER); > > //non service > AutoMateParser autoMateParser = new AutoMateParser(importTask); > > //With Service > autoMateParser.set(importTasks); > > > I tried something like this below, > > public static AutoMateParser autoMateParserBuilder(ImportTask importTask) { > return new AutoMateParser(importTask); > } > > but couldn't figure out how to actually pass my import obj into the > builder method so it ends up . The only way I know of getting that non > service obj into my Service is with a set. Could you explain an alternate > way to passing in that obj so it ends up in the service constructor? > >> > The last question where I'm still a little confused is related to using >> > services inside extended classes. Because I'm declaring >> > AutoMateParser.class as a service, but extending say Parser.class, >> would >> > I be able to inject my services inside my extended class without having >> >> > to declare Parser.class in my AppModule a service? >> >> Yes. >> >> -- >> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [hidden >> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5715610&i=1> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [hidden >> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=5715610&i=2> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the >> discussion below: >> >> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Question-tapestry-service-tp5715573p5715610.html >> To unsubscribe from Question tapestry service, click >> here<http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5715573&code=Z2NocmlzdG1hbkBjYXJkYWRkeS5jb218NTcxNTU3M3wxNjMyOTYxMjA3> >> . >> NAML<http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> >> > > > > -- > George Christman > www.CarDaddy.com > P.O. Box 735 > Johnstown, New York > > > -- George Christman www.CarDaddy.com P.O. Box 735 Johnstown, New York -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Question-tapestry-service-tp5715573p5715613.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
