On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 15:43:48 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <hls...@gmail.com>
wrote:
That looks like another bug to me; for anything that goes into a URL
(as path or query parameter) the code should be using a ValueEncoder.
By the way, sometimes I miss having separate encoders for fields and URLs.
What is good for fields may be ugly for URLs. Of course, this value
encoder for URLs could use the regular ValueEncoder as a fallback when no
specific one for the type is found.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
