That's a good solution, can you have a maven entry for that?
also, does it handle nested json objects?
Thanks,
Christian Riedel-4 wrote
>
> This might be solved using a custom PropertyBinding and should look like
> ${json:property.name}…
> Challenge accepted!
>
> https://gist.github.com/3187796
>
>
> Am 27.07.2012 um 02:16 schrieb Angelo C.:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> you have this in the code,
>>
>> public JSONObject getJS() {
>> JSONObject js = new JSONObject();
>> js.put("name1","123");
>> return js;
>> }
>>
>> then in the template:
>> ${js.get('name1')}
>>
>> considering json objects are used often nowadays, possible to have a
>> direct
>> support in template? maybe some other prefix like:
>> #{js.name1}
>>
>> what do you think?
>>
>> Angelo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/json-support-in-template-tp5714820.html
>> Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@.apache
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@.apache
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@.apache
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@.apache
>
--
View this message in context:
http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/json-support-in-template-tp5714820p5714846.html
Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
