Yes, I really should have asked you to verify that earlier.  I'm
running the final batch of tests on the 5.4 code, then will be
backporting it as 5.3.4-rc-1.

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Robert Lentz <rob...@teksolv.de> wrote:
> Forgot to mention that we are using Tapestry 5.3.3.
>
> Regards
> Robert
>
> Am 11.05.2012 18:44, schrieb Robert Lentz:
>> Howard,
>>
>> thank you very much for the quick and insightful response.
>> I haven't yet understood the code completely, why that many synchronized
>> methods are invoked like ( private synchronized void
>> resetParameterConduits() etc)
>> I would be really happy to test your  "shortly and crank out a
>> 5.3.4-rc-1 snapshot" version as soon as it will be available!
>> Let me know, if I can assist you in someway.
>>
>> All the Best and Thx
>> Robert
>>
>>
>> Am 11.05.2012 18:34, schrieb Howard Lewis Ship:
>>> In case I wasn't clear; I'm waiting for a commitment that you will
>>> retest with updated Tapestry code before I make the changes.  I'm
>>> willing to juggle my schedule to assist, if you're ready to do your
>>> part.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
>



-- 
Howard M. Lewis Ship

Creator of Apache Tapestry

The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to
learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast!

(971) 678-5210
http://howardlewisship.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org

Reply via email to